Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathosray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Synergy 04:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pathosray

Band fails WP:MUSIC. Most recent album was released by a non-notable label. Others were self released. No refs to support notability. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 17:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The band's album was released by Sensory Records and references can be found on http://www.lasercd.com/

Sensory is a well know publisher within the scene.

Panzerschrek076 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panzerschreck076 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ unless reliable sources are found. There are a couple of reviews online, mostly positive, but not in what I'd call reliable sources. I can't judge Sensory Records' notability, but the band fails the "two or more albums" criterion of WP:MUSIC anyway. Huon (talk) 20:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to weak keep due to new sources and a better understanding on my part of the given sources' reliability. Huon (talk) 13:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1. In the context of their genre, I feel the references stand up. Here's an Allmusic.com one too just to fill it out a little more. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is some notability--heavy metal is not blessed with a plethora of printed magazines or independent journals. The Aardschok reference is plenty reliable, and some of the others should be ranked a bit higher than merely fanzines or blogs. Drmies (talk) 04:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.