Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ParcelDirect.ie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ParcelDirect.ie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:PROMO and WP:NCORP. "Save up to 80%" is a pretty big red flag here. Provided sources do not support notability. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 18:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete the provided references are PR push stuff, and I get a total of four hits in GNews, two of which are listed here and two of which are a competition. No evidence of notability - David Gerard (talk) 09:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete - WP:TOOSOON - not enough significant coverage in reliable sources found in standard searches. Best so far is a brief writeup in the Irish Independent [1] -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 11:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 11:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP. Issues in particular with GNG and CORPDEPTH. Provided and independently "Googled" coverage seems routine and trivial. The seemingly only "independent" source (Joe.ie from Jul 2015) upon investigation also doesn't all that independent ("we’ve teamed up with ParcelDirect.ie" Joe.ie Jun 2015[2]). Also not in keeping with WP:NWEB (not every website needs an article). General promotional tone also concerning. Guliolopez (talk) 00:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NCORP. Class455 (talk) 04:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.