Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Companion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paper Companion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web-based software. No indication of meeting WP:PRODUCT or WP:WEB. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 23:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 23:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 23:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 23:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's really odd to find absolutely nothing on google, and a web site that says nothing at all, (at least, nothing until you sign up for it, which I am not about to do for something where there's no information) Prod was declined,and it's a products so speedy a7 isn't applicable, but perhaps G11 ? DGG ( talk ) 00:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not spammish enough to speedy delete but clearly fails WP:NSOFT. Pichpich (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I noticed this earlier and was going to comment, nothing at all for any applicable notability and there would be nothing else convincing given it was started only this month, nothing at all acceptable any time soon. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly failing GNG. — crh ₂₃ (Talk) 15:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.