Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paniel Meat Processing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paniel Meat Processing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This evidently fails WP:ORGCRIT without stressing. The sources do not add any pinch of salt to ORGCRIT for the company in question. Of course, WP:GNG is not satisfied either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, Companies, Africa, and Mauritius. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the nominator. Afro 📢Talk! 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another corporate article that talks more about its finances than what the company actually does in practice. Nathannah • 📮 00:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - References do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Creator should have improved in draft space prior to moving back but here we are. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:56, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. doesn't have enough proper sources to establish notability. Darkm777 (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.