Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxylabs
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oxylabs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poor sourcing, fails WP:GNG. Noting that some review articles exist about Oxylabs, although they appear to contain multiple affiliate links. The only piece of significant coverage I'm seeing about the company exists in the form of this TechRadar article about a lawsuit.[1] 30Four (talk) 17:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Lithuania. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:50, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. No RS, no SIGCOV. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Weak keep: It is among the most notable residential proxy providers, along with Luminati. There's quite some technical discussion and brief company description in a book [1] published by O'Reilly Media, which is one of the top publishers in its category. There's also mentions in a lot of papers like [2] or [3], including significant technical discussion involving independent research of its network [4]. Also an in-depth review at PCMag [5]. And the source mentioned in the nomination. In terms of WP:ORGDEPTH, it seems a bit borderline though. MarioGom (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: no majr coverage. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 23:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)