Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrderStack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OrderStack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not pass WP:GNG. Product of UPE (see history). Note that I stubbed the article because none of the sources used talked about OrderStack. You may want to check the article previous to my clean up too ([1]). MarioGom (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cannot find any sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Polyamorph (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete The current version has relevant references. 12:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy Delete per snowball, In no way are three primary sources relevant references. Btw, it's hilarious the user of the single keep vote deleted their signature to try and hide that there vote was probably attached to a COI account. Haha. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I do not believe this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH as I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. The article has been created by a single-purpose account with a likely conflict of interest and is just a free advertisement for the startup company. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Nothing in gnews. LibStar (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with prejudice. Dorama285 (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No coverage found for the current or previous "Skipthecommission" name. The TNGONE parent has no article so provides no redirect option. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 14:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.