Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenUP
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- OpenUP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This doesn't meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG. At best some content could be merged into Eclipse process framework, but there doesn't seem to be much verifiable content anyway. — xDanielx T/C\R 19:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.