Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontd ai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ontd ai

Non-notable web forum; violates WP:ADVERT; WP:WEB' WP:SPAM mhking (talk) 21:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Community is actually very notable as one of the largest spinoffs from ontd_proper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.115.176.28 (talk) 15:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Non notable group. Most of the sources are primary, most of the remainder are blogs and the two remaining don't mention the group at all. I42 (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since there are no references that establish this even remotely as a encyclopedic topic. A speedy is indeed still possible, I think. Drmies (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete on A7 (web). Only thigns that tote notability are the blog page itself - the Livejournal community. Apparently, some celeb from American Idol sees it. That's it. This doesn't make an LJ community notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.