Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onetius (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 08:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Onetius

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:WEBCRIT or WP:GNG, as per source searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article substantially edited by WP:SPA accounts likely to be associated with this enterprise [1]. Google search provides a few advertorial-level items in Croatian online media since the 2014 start-up coverage, but I am not seeing the in-depth coverage needed to demonstrate encyclopaedic notability, whether by WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:NWEB. AllyD (talk) 07:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm seeing no signs of notability anywhere. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.