Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omneky

Omneky

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Omneky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. All citations are press releases, media wires, or otherwise non-independent. No significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Blackpot-kettle (talk) 05:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:TOOSOON. There are TechCrunch (2022, Reference #15) and Adweek (2022, Reference #19) articles but nothing from curated searches that is more recent to indicate these are anything more than a WP:SPIP blip.

Per nominator, References #1, 7-14, 16, 18, 20-23, 26-32 are some form of wire release; References #2, 4, 24 are brief mentions, Reference #25 is similar to the aforementioned TechCrunch and Adweek blip; Reference #6 is a contributor article; Reference #5 is an interview. I will refrain from commenting on the merits of References #3 and 17 not knowing the verifiability of Japanese but the former does say "PR Times" in the markup. Astapor12 (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

• Keep while most of the references are similar to press-releases, the TechCrunch, non-contributor Forbes (video on best AI startups), google books (search via books shows significant coverage) and other media provide some good reliable media coverage (not SPIP or paid). Norlk (talk) 12:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep techrunch, adweek and buisnessinsider give deep coverage to meet NCORP and count as reliable coverage.--Salamandra-12 (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)