Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Particular Night in Fun City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No Particular Night in Fun City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NFILM/GNG/NWEB. Lourdes 10:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources, nor evidence that the film had been widely distributed or reviewed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DEL8, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. — Sam Sailor 06:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 09:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.