Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Ruston
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Deadbeef
01:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nicolas Ruston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Created by almost-WP:SPA and prod removed by IP. Tagged for notability for almost 7 years. Boleyn (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: I think he passes GNG, there is plenty of coverage out there on him. The BBC reference for example [1]. Vrac (talk) 22:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (talk) @ 15:55, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (talk) @ 15:55, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - not even close to being notable. Bearian (talk) 05:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.