Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicol Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:30, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nicol Rodriguez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient RS coverage that is non-trivial. Tagged for notability for over 2 years. Perhaps the SPA creator of the article was influenced by the similarity in her name to that of the subject of the article.Epeefleche (talk) 02:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No attempt to demonstrate coverage in secondary sources in the article. Google does not support notability. asnac (talk) 15:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Added a ref about various awards she's received from a third-party website, but may still fail GNG. Dcoetzee 14:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL - I see no evidence that his art is noted in textbooks, or discussed in art history scholarship, or is displayed in major museums/galleries. Bearian (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.