Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeDi (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- NeDi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is written like an advertisement and is not worth keeping in my opinion. This article also doesn't appear to meet notability requirements. A previous discussion was had about deleting this article and no action despite a delete consensus. Garsh (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 7. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The article was deleted in 2008 but re-created. Sourcing amounts to two blog articles and a forum post... doesn't sufficient to establish notability. --Here2rewrite (talk) 19:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The InfoWorld and CIO Magazine sources are not blogs, but they are the same article that also appears to have been published on ComputerWorld. (They share the same publisher and thus are not independent of each other.) I see a few WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in scholarly publications but no additional WP:SIGCOV beyond the IW/CW/CIO source to get to WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.