Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NACER.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NACER.org

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in WP:RS. Refs are dead links, Way back has one: [1], not an RS. Can't get to the other. PROD removed without comment by an SPA. Vrac (talk) 21:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that this fails WP:ORG. Also agree that reliable sourcing is not out there. Furthermore, the official web site indicates that its (US) tax exemption expired at the end of 2008, with no indication of renewal. If this organization has stopped its activities, then the few things mentioned in the article constitute the only things it ever did or will do. And, those few things are not enough to confer notability, regardless of how well-sourced they were. The Talk page for the article mentions a NPOV discussion that took place between the article's creator and another editor. That discussion took place on the other editor's Talk page, but that editor has since departed Wikipedia. I found the discussions (there were more than one) in the archives here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as the best I found was this and here and this lasted since May 2007 so there was more than enough time for improvement. Pinfinf tagger HaeB. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.