Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukesh Mishra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 20:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh Mishra

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Karate coach, no coverage in reliable sources. Declined by Bonadea see [1] and just after the decline the Draft was moved to mainspace by the creator, see [2]. Previous deletions can be checked here, [3]. Taabii (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Games, India, and Bihar. Taabii (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, smells like a bit of COI, or a vanity article. Nswix (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:BIO and looks like a vanity piece. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It does appear to be a likely COI. More importantly, I can't find what I would call significant independent coverage of him by independent sources. I found no mentions of him at the WKF website or in the results of any major adult karate competition--not Commonwealth, continental, or world championships. I see no evidence of him meeting any WP notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems like a vanity page and notability is not established as per WP:BIO or WP:SIGCOV. Lekkha Moun (talk) 07:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet WP:GNG (WP:NBIO / WP:SPORTCRIT). This article was rejected twice in the AfC process; however, the editor moved it to the mainspace regardless. QEnigma talk 14:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable, COI. Geode (talk) 09:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I evaluated the sources when it was in AfC, and now I've tried to find better sourcing without success. --bonadea contributions talk 15:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please note the comment by an editor of this article lodged at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mukesh Mishra which I believe should be considered as an opinion for retention. I present it uncritically for the closing admin to consider. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Too promotion(both article content and refs), non-notable person, created by a possible sock see Dbgbr and Doonbh's edit contributions on the page and this user(s) have been moving back and forth the page between namespaces and were warned several times about the behaviour. Lastly, page deletion logs as seen here and the number of times the draft was declined at AFC are enough to show that the article should be deleted, users blocked as socks and name protected. ANU^writes 18:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am highly appreciate your contributions but kindly check twice the content and reference which is all relevant and independent sources. I will be more appreciate if you do help to edit or need any correction to improve. Thanks & best regards Dbgbr (talk) 19:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As a WP editor it's my responsibility to help editing if required+capable but not this time untill you resolve the issues we discussed here. I've also checked the article thrice and I still support my points ANU^writes 04:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Dear Editors, please take a look at this [4] as well. Baqi:) (talk) 11:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dbgbr where global locks have been requested. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:42, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.