Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moorlands C of E Primary Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of schools in Norfolk. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moorlands C of E Primary Academy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article since 2016. BEFORE showed no SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. There is mill coverage in local news about topics such as the school buying new computers, the type of coverage every school will receive. Nothing that is SIGCOV or that demonstates N. Fails GNG and ORGCRIT. This is a nice normal school, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 23:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's not likely that a primary school has notability and I couldn't find secondary sources to provide any proof of notability. Suonii180 (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we need to stop the practice of having articles sourced only to the articles own website. The long standing consensus is that almost no elementary/primary schools are notable, that to be notable you need reliable 3rd party sources giving in-depth coverage, and several such sources doing that, mere mention in a book is generally not even going to be enough for such to show notability for an elementary school, and clearly just the fact that an institution has a website does not mean we should have an article on it. Yes, I know we currently have thousands of articles on institutions sourced only to their website, but the fact that our policies are flagrantly ignored should not mean we should not try to enforce them at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ~~Norfolk_County_Council~~ per WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG#N. Orville^talk 05:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize the Council had a separate list for their schools. I agree with User:Buidhe that List of schools in Norfolk would be a better redirect target. Orville^talk 03:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Norfolk County Council as not enough coverage for a standalone article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, but to List of schools in Norfolk where it's actually mentioned rather than the county council article where it isn't. (t · c) buidhe 23:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nom comment: No objection to a redirect to List of schools in Norfolk. I don't think its useful, but redirects are cheap. // Timothy :: t | c | a 03:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of schools in Norfolk, which appears to be the most relevant article. The school is entirely non-notable, and the article doesn't approach meeting WP:ORG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.