Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modestas Mankus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace) by Yunshui. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicology (talk • contribs)

Modestas Mankus

Note Moved to Draft:Modestas Mankus in middle of WP:AFD. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 13:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable filmmaker who falls under too soon as well. His award is basically a non notable award as well. Wgolf (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Renata (talk) 00:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note After the AFD notice was posted, the author moved it into the draft namespace. I do not think this is the appropriate action to circumvent an AFD. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 12:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will consider such behavior disruptive but it seems the page creator is a new user. What do we do in this case? Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the 'draft' article, and politely explain on their talk page why. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, we shouldn't delete the draft article. AFD is not a contest, and you haven't been cheated of anything here. If the article had been recently created as a draft, it wouldn't get deleted because we don't require draft articles to be of the same standard as mainspace articles. The user did the correct thing, we don't need to do anything further. The user corrected their own problem, and now there is no need to further hassle them. --Jayron 32 13:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - absolutely no coverage in sources at all, there is a walled garden link to the similarly non-notable Our Culture Records which I think should also be sent to AfD. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A mere ~2,000 google hits, of which the top 10 are social media, or this article. Clearly never going to pass the notability requirements, and the move to the draft space should not be used to circumvent this deletion. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 13:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jayron32, let the editor work on the artice. If it can be improved great, if not there is always MfD. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Request speedy close This isn't an article, its a draft so I don't see how this would qualify here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.