Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitto Password Manager (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mitto Password Manager

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plagued with issues, dead links to its official website or extension download pages. Needs to go. First nom didn't have enough participants. ~★ nmaia ^d 01:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Though very problematic advertisement-like material could and should be removed, I can't find any reliable sources on the topic. Noahfgodard (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs) ( Stupid bot : I've restored this !vote because it was wiped by an edit ... Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC) )[reply]

Keep: Dead links, which may sometimes be temporary, are not a reason for deletion. The article has been disrupted by claims of advertising which may be unfounded and at AfD I like to see it at the time of nom. not as negatively edited subsequently ... as that is often a sign a !delete voter needs to do that to win the argument ... positive improvements are welcome. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:N. Compare with 1Password and LastPass, which have received significant sustained attention from WP:RS. XVDC (talk) 11:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Djm-leighpark – Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 07:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the last reference is a decent software review which builds on the matter in the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.