Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitto Password Manager (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mitto Password Manager

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-defunct website that never had notability, and certainly doesn’t have it now. Last AfD came out inconclusive, mostly due to a user since blocked. K. Oblique 17:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. K. Oblique 17:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, all arguments for keeping in the last two AFDs amounted to WP:SOURCESEXIST. This has had three chances for people to bring up more sourcing and no one's done it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Both Occam's Razor and a Google search suggest that this can't be adequately sourced. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 01:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I could find zero RS coverage. Pabsoluterince (talk) 01:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - insufficient coverage for inclusion, I could find nothing warranting inclusion. I mean nothing! I could not even find proper primary sources let alone independent coverage. Such-change47 (talk) 06:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.