Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bluestone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Gargoyles characters. MBisanz ^talk 05:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Bluestone

Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject Jay32183 (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable source for notability. Besides, Gargoyles has its own Wikia apparently. That's the best place to put this kind of detailed article.--Boffob (talk) 00:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Right, and that's an awful lot of words for such little real-world value. Drmies (talk) 03:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Gargoyles characters and merge heavily condensed plot details as per WP:FICT. Also the name itself makes for a reasonable redirect. There might be little real-world content, but the lead and the first section can be given a home (at least the very first sentence is referenced). A lack of real-world value only shows the subject is fictional and might not be worth a separate article. It says nothing about not covering it at all. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keepThis is a recurrent character that appears in several media. The article has a source and a character developement section. Laurent paris (talk) 01:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per MGM--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.