Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathias Ibo
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:14, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Mathias Ibo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not think that what is asserted is notable. I recognize we have difficulty finding sources in this area, but I find it hard to imagine sourcing which would be sufficient to show notability. DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Lack of sources is irrelevant. --Merbabu (talk) 08:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:56, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:56, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:41, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is no indication this article meeat WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:40, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.