Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathematics of Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs) as a copyvio (non-admin closure) Goodvac (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics of Language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If it is not a copyvio then it is original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree. It seems to be WP:OR violation, mere stream of conciousness from an editor who is Hungarian or read a Hungarian mathematics books or 3. Speedy Delete. scope_creep (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't know whether it's OR or a copyvio, but either way it's bullshit. Trying to claim a genetic relationship between Hungarian, Chinese, and Sumerian is textbook linguistic crackpottery. —Angr (talk) 23:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for sound reasons above. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Speedy delete as a copyvio of http://www.fdavidpeat.com/bibliography/essays/maths.htm. Goodvac (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.