Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manu Intiraymi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 01:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manu Intiraymi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure this person passes WP:NACTOR, mostly minor roles. Can't find any reliable sources discussing them apart from the cited nytimes source which isn't specifically about Intiraymi, but mentions him in passing in 3 paragraphs of a rather long piece about the state of the entertainment industry in LA in the late 1990s. Other sources I have been able to find are Star Trek fansites, which I wouldn't consider significant coverage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Science fiction and fantasy, and California. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Re WP:NACTOR, this subject has played a significant role in Star Trek: Voyager. But I am not finding that his role in One Tree Hill (TV series) was very significant. And it would take one or two more solid ones to find that he did so in multiple productions. The subject also fails WP:ANYBIO for lack of in-depth biographical coverage by unrelated parties. JFHJr (㊟) 00:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, but also JFHjr, who touches on ANYBIO. I think this is a fundamental fail. Perhaps when their career trajectory continues in the way they want it, it'll be different. Not quite now though. ——Serial Number 54129 00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe WP:TOOSOON? JFHJr (㊟) 01:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes JFHJr thanks, that's good advice 👍 ——Serial Number 54129 09:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another problem is that his employees and followers seem to be trying to turn the article into a giant biased PR advertisement of him in an attempt to counter the negative publicity he has brought from numerous comments on social media. When one of his employees was banned for doing so, another promptly stepped up to continue it. Captain Bipto (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails both NACTOR and GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 16:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet Wikipedia notability criteria. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per notability concerns. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.