Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maker's Asylum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maker's Asylum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page. I see a few references in Indian media but they seem to mostly be PR guff and there's little to see that would be considered substantial and independent. JMWt (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Afstromen (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Comment I’d prefer to hold off on sharing my opinion until I’ve reviewed some sources I found on Google. 1 2 3 4. It think these sources can help in establishing notability. Afstromen (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.