Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Main Page (6th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to de:Hauptseite. (non-admin closure) AlphaBeta135 talk 00:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)‎[reply]

Main Page

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Let's make Wikipedia harder to navigate for no reason at all! M.C. (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, ORES says it's stub quality which is pathetic given it's had more than 20 years to improve. jolielover♥talk 16:52, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:24, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(the nominator forgot to remove line "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AFD". I have done it now so the bot will stop adding it back to the serious log) ApexParagon (talk) 17:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've always wanted Wikipedia to become harder to navigate. Who needs things like "new users" or "contributors who aren't that experienced with wikis yet"? This would be a great opportunity to bite them and chase them away. Also, the Main Page clearly violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Delete. ApexParagon (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to !: According to Special:AllPages, it's the first article alphabetically, so logically it should be the first one viewers see. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 17:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's WP:USEFUL so it should stay around. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 22:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.