Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MachoPsycho
Appearance
	
	
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
					- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 
The result was delete. Tan | 39 16:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- MachoPsycho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
 
All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] 
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] 
Weak delete - Maybe, just maybe, they might squeak by for being just notable enough per WP:COMPOSER, but it's hard to tell. Determining whether the sources that come up on on a news search are reliable/third-party is difficult for me at least (I don't understand Swedish). The only English-language sites seem to promote their appearance at a seminar for music production software. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 00:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 - Delete Fails WP:BIO - significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject. I couldn't find that in Gnews. Most coverage in English was incidental. RayTalk 07:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.