Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MULE
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep Procedural/IAR. Sufficient sourcing has been IDed (thank you) to counter the nom which was one of many today Star Mississippi 01:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MULE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, obviously. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. The software has significant independent coverage in the "The CJK package for LaTeX 2ε — Multilingual support beyond babel" by Werner Lemberg (TUGboat 18(3):214–224, 1997) and CJKV Information Processing: Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese by Ken Lunde (O'Reilly, 2nd ed., 2009; mostly on pp. 646–647). It's also the subject of multiple scientific conference papers which, although not entirely independent of the software, did at least undergo peer review:
- K. Handa, M. Nishikimi, and S. Tamura. "Mule: A MULtilingual Enhancement to GNU Emacs." In Proceedings 1993 International Networking Conference (INET 93).
- K. Handa, M. Nishikimi, S. Tomura, and N. Takahashi. "Unified and Extensible Mechanism for Multilingual Text Processing." In Proceedings of the Fourth Pacific Rim Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI '96).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.