Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunar Magic (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. /ƒETCH COMMS / 00:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lunar Magic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No non-trivial coverage found. Best I could find was a fluff piece about a man who proposed through a custom made Super Mario World level. Utterly fails any sort of notability for software. Last AFD closed in 2006 with a consensus to redirect to Super Mario World, which wouldn't make sense as a present-day solution since the current SMW article makes no mention of it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. The first AfD result was a redirect to Super Mario World. This time I'm advocating:

1. A full delete, not a redirect.

2. A stern warning for the person that recreated the page.

3. A block on recreating the page.

Trouts might need to fly. Sven Manguard _Talk 02:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Reach Out to the Truth 02:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Keristrasza (talk) 10:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while cool, it all comes down to WP:GNG - significant coverage from reliable sources, and there's just not the coverage needed. --Teancum (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Super Mario World. Innumerable hacks have been made using this tool, including an entire meme of perpetual motion videos made of custom SMW levels. - Gilgamesh (talk) 22:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks ccredible sources Infinitely Humble (talk) 23:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.