Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunar Magic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Super Mario World. It should really be a delete because no one has offered a single independent source, but given the claims of notability maybe it can be brought back with proper sourcing. ~ trialsanderrors 06:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable ROM Hacking related program. Newspaper98 10:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no assertion of notability. MER-C 13:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Why did you change it from prod to AFD? The prod was about to pass, now it's going to just be dragged out longer. --GUTTERTAHAH 20:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I agree... this nom seems very odd. I support delete in any case. ---J.S (T/C) 21:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete! I was familiar with Lunar Magic well before stumbling onto its entry, and I wish there were more entries like it. Wwjdd 01:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Super Mario World or ROM hacking. --Ixfd64 06:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Are you kidding? This is a popular well known piece of software. Why not delete every console emulator entry too? And what does the fact that it's related to ROM hacking have to do with anything?--71.229.77.97 02:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Seems notable enough, but needs more work. --Andre ✉ 21:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article itself needs some major work, but the topic is one of the best and most notable ROM editors out there. - Joshua368 01:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is original and innovative. - MSTCrow 15:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.