Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logodaedaly

Logodaedaly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Logodaedaly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An extended dictionary definition. Includes a number of quotations, a couple of which are already in the perfectly good Wiktionary entry, and some usage notes, but no indication of significant coverage of the word itself as a subject. Search engine results are largely dictionary definitions and lists of unusual words. Opus 113 (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Opus 113 (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOTDICT. All of the sources, except for an actual dictionary, are primary usages of the term, not coverage of the term or concept. hinnk (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)