Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisolette Gilcrest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete: pretty clearly spammy article for a non-notable person. Drmies (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lisolette Gilcrest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article about non-notable photographer/artist; trying for notability by association, without awareness of WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS. Orange Mike | Talk 03:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:NOTYET. She has the potential to be famous surely but the level of exhibitions etc. is clearly at too low a level just yet. Mangoe (talk) 13:41, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — This subject fails WP:GNG for lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources. She does get lots of mention in lists of names, in somewhat reliable and unreliable sources. But nothing significant. Going through WP:BEFORE, sources showed the article contained a lot of puff. The WP:LOTSOFSOURCES in fact indicate a brief mention, her name among 119 artists exhibited, and her name in a long list of book prize recipients. There's also her name in a pile of very brief entertainment listings, and a minuscule mention in the promotional upcoming event announcement. The first shows she exists; the second can't really support prose on events that hadn't happened as of publication. I found confirmation in the Detroit Free Press that she had an exhibit at a local arts festival, but the coverage was about the festival, and only mentioned this subject. All of this indicates she falls short of both WP:CREATIVE and WP:ANYBIO. JFHJr (㊟) 16:09, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.