Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinkedNotes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jamie^☆S93 00:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LinkedNotes

Contested prod. The prod rationale was "non notable software." Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, NN software. Article reads like an advertisement. Nakon 02:27, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- J^mundo 03:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertorial. Let me know if situation changes... ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No inline citations but external links are there. I suggest that this AfD discussion is delayed for a period of 24 hours to give editors a chance to find reliable sources. Then, discussion may continue.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 10:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD already has a seven day period. Nakon 19:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as the person who originally PRODed the thing. - TexasAndroid (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sounds like an advertisment. A quick search on Google didn't bring up anything. Laurent (talk) 11:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam for commercial software with free "basic" version available. Not even notable software either. Nuwewsco (talk) 12:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.