Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Licorize

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licorize

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing significant in coverage. Fails WP:NWEB. Störm (talk) 14:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:NWEB. Being on the "Smashing Magazine 2010 list of 50 Powerful Time-Savers For Web Designers" strongly suggests "non-notable" and "too soon" (or maybe never). K.e.coffman (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.