Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Librex (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Librex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not able to find any significant coverage that isn't from student media. Per WP:STUDENTMEDIA, "a topic which can be sourced exclusively to student media, with no evidence of wider coverage in mass market general interest media, is not likely to be viewed as notable." I think that is clearly the case here. ––FormalDude talk 06:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 21:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 21:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 21:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 21:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:TOOSOON. Has not been around for long, and would need to stand the test of time in my opinion, and not be just another "two kids and an app" which come and go routinely. There are a few sources, even being student media they might be given the benefit of a doubt in the long run. However, most likely this will go the same way as other efforts based on volunteers (such as other Wikis like the several wannabe competitors to Wikipedia): go moribund when the founders graduate and need to get real jobs to pay the bills. W Nowicki (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete coverage seems mainly limited to student media rather than independent sources. LibStar (talk) 05:44, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Recommend salting as the page has been recreated after multiple deletion discussions. ––FormalDude ^talk 06:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.