Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexical balancing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lexical balancing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced text dump, possible WP:OR no indication of notability. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 11:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom Dazzling4 (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don’t see any sources to support this and wonder if it is based on a misunderstanding. Mccapra (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of significant coverage found (t · c) buidhe 09:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Given the edit history of the editor who created the article, this is most likely a hoax. --McSly (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.