Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legacy Broadcasting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy Broadcasting

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP due to a lack of in depth and significant coverage regarding the subject of the article. PROD was declined. Let'srun (talk) 14:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Companies. Let'srun (talk) 14:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, current sources are all press releases - in other sources "Legacy Broadcasting" is just a footnote tag - unable to find more sources on the internet, made difficult by other results coming up name - solidly fails WP:GNG RetroCosmos ^talk 17:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The company's entire existence seems to be solely for regulatory purposes and the stations it ran were designed to be as non-competitive as possible in their markets until a new owner could buy them out under a more friendly FCC regulatory environment. The company's 'owners' were effectively caretaker managers who also fulfilled the 'minority and women' checkmark to smooth over the FCC until they could sell again, and this business was never a serious effort to establish a competitive broadcaster. Nate • (chatter) 18:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and Mississippi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There's really not much you can say about a company that basically only owns/owned "excess" stations following another company's mergers, so the lack of the requisite significant coverage isn't exactly a surprise. Mentions of the company in the articles for their stations is sufficient; this never really warranted an article, and very little will be lost with its deletion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per above, and Fails WP:GNG due to mainly press release sources. TLA (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.