Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learn More Link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Learn More Link

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely coherent essay on a non-notable topic. Fails WP:GNG, WP:V, and WP:NOT. Brad v 19:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This has been recreated at least 3 times under different names. The first couple versions were a copy vio. This weird essay is the only thing this guy is interested in creating, and somehow it seems to be related to the facebook page used as a source, but I'm not sure how. Natureium (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 12:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 12:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for all the reasons given above, and consider carrying over the salting that was applied to the last title where the author repeatedly recreated this essay. MarginalCost (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Nielsen Norman Group piece cited in the article could contribute to establishing notability, but the other sources are variously not reliable, not independent, or insubstantial; in the absence of any other sources, and especially any scholarly or journalistic sources, WP:GNG is not met. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt as per above. Agricolae (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete salt and block the editor. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.