Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leadx Management Training Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leadx Management Training Institute

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded with the rationale, "added more information", which consisted of adding the logo and the date the place began operations. Zero independent sources, and searches did not turn up enough to show that it passes WP:GNG, or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lets see, there's one primary reference in the article and all I could find in a WP:BEFORE was brief, trivial name drops in a few articles about other things. It's not a public educational institution either. So, it would have to pass WP:NORG. Which it clearly doesn't as things currently )and likely will continue to) stand. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we need independent sources to show notability, which are lacking here. Not every organization that has a website is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, could be also G11. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES. We almost always delete articles about managers, trainers, and producers, because they are so ordinary. I do not see the kind of significant coverage that would show them to be an exception to the rule, such as Colonel Tom Parker. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian:, I think you might have posted your "vote" in the wrong AfD. Adamant1 (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.