Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kettel (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies - let me know if you would like the article moved to your userspace. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kettel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. A previous version of this article was previously deleted at AFD in 2016 for similar issues. RA0808 talkcontribs 03:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. RA0808 talkcontribs 03:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. RA0808 talkcontribs 03:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would also argue that criterion 5 is met by his release of three works on Planet Mu. My vote is therefore Keep, although I won't object if another consensus is drawn (I'm relatively new to Wikipedia after all). BriefAeon (talk) 09:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.