Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JustiServ
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. asilvering (talk) 11:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JustiServ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the company is no longer active, and the article lacks reliable independent sources to establish notability. It primarily contains promotional content and does not meet Wikipedia’s guidelines for verifiability and significant coverage Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I'm surprised that when I did some clean-up many years ago I didn't register how promotional the article was and didn't take more measures than I did. Anyway, the sources in the article are of low quality for WP:N purposes, and I find nothing online now that lends itself to a finding of notability. Google finds only 120 mentions altogether in a verbatim search, and among them at best there's this one profile of its founders. On top of that, the only suggestion of significance in the article is "JustiServ has been selected to be a part of Highland Capital Partners' 2015 Summer@Highland, a startup accelerator which helps student entrepreneurs build their companies over the summer", which doesn't really indicate significance at all, it's like saying an American lawyer is significant because they clerked for a Supreme Court justice for two years after law school. Largoplazo (talk) 10:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Websites, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not appear to have valid secondary sourcing to prove notability to pass WP:ORGCRIT. Youtube is not a valid source. Source #5 is dead. Source #6 is about Sarah Reed and only has passing mention of JustiServe at the end of the article: "Reed also thinks the legal field should embrace the opportunity to match clients and attorneys over the Internet. She offers as an example JustiServ, a website being developed by Harvard undergraduate Michael Gants (the son of Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Ralph D. Gants ’80 and Northeastern Law Professor Deborah Ramirez ’81), whom Reed met at last spring’s conference. Expected to launch this year, the website will publish lawyers’ rates, allowing consumers to compare." m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 23:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.