Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumpshot Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jumpshot Films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources unconnected to the subject. Fails WP:CORP as well. ^Bongo_matic 00:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as reliable secondary sources are not available and the company appears non notable. --Stormbay (talk) 02:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please review, new sources provided. --Wikimanage77 (talk) 02:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No new sources, delete. —I-20 the highway 15:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--I don't see any notability here. Drmies (talk) 23:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Topic appears to be notable. The article just needs some work. --Alpha Quadrant ^talk 22:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 22:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Google news search straight away points to this article [1] in the Seattle Times, talking about the 19 year veteran film producer, and this his company. Wikipedia so far only has one article for any of the movies this production company has created, Max Rules. A production company is notable for its films produced and who it is associated with, just as a record company is notable for its hit albums and what famous musicians have signed with it. Dream Focus 23:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an incorrect reading of the guidelines. If the individual is notable, so be it. That doesn't make a company founded by him notable automatically as notability is not inherited. ^Bongo_matic 01:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Sources in the article only prove that the company exists, not that it is notable. Many of the sources never even mention the term "Jumpshot" at at all. The source provided by Dream Focus above mentions it once (in parentheses). SnottyWong ^comment 23:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.