Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Primiani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Primiani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Primiani lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Current independent coverage says very little about him or doesn't even mention him. Claimed awards are not awards and are not significant coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO / WP:WEBHOST. A vanity page for a non notable businessperson. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Those are some remarkable claims. I was almost disappointed when the references section was notably short on RSes. Delete as it stands - David Gerard (talk) 01:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as being entirely PR for an occupation and business that comes with PR. SwisterTwister talk 23:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.