Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Depledge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Joseph Depledge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Is he notable? Couldn't find much information. dmyersturnbull ⇒ talk 00:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Stoke was a top-flight club at the time and almost certainly professional. He thus passes WP:ATH. Such is the tragedy of WP:ATH. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How is it a "tragedy"? He played in the top division of English football. Is it a "tragedy" that a player in the Premier League nowadays is notable??? Keep. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - passes WP:ATHLETE -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I hardly think this is a tragedy of WP:ATHLETE, unless we want to be overrun with Presentism. matt91486 (talk) 21:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - clearly meets WP:ATHLETE. GiantSnowman 21:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.