Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Conway
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was rewrite as a disambiguation page. Sandstein 08:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Joe Conway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable Irish local councillor, possible vanity article. Fails WP:Politician and WP:GNG Snappy (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —Snappy (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Snappy (talk) 17:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: Does being a representative for the South-East Regional Authority and the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe fulfill the "sub-national office" requirement for WP:POLITICIAN #2? Location (talk) 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but only as dab page. (@Location, I doubt it, I would think those items would let in way too many politicians that would be otherwise nonnotable.) Aside from Location's question, definitely fails WP:POLITICIAN. There are several Joe Conways more notable than this one from Ireland: one from Yeovil, UK, one from Arizona (got 20,000 votes for U.S. Senate), one nominated for a screenplay award. If nonprimary sources arise, create Joe Conway (Irish politician) and add to the dab page. County council is not a subnational office (100,000 people), that would be Munster, one of the 4 provinces of Ireland; I would use that along with the source failure as a delete vote (recognizing my Amero-bias and that events may, might, adjust the playing field later). JJB 18:58, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Disambigify per JJB.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 23:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Done boldly JJB 06:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.