Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jillian Shea Spaeder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jillian Shea Spaeder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual who fails WP:NACTOR and WP:MUSICBIO. The article subject has yet to accrue the significant role(s) and cultural influence required by Wikipedia's notability standards, and has not produced any notable music. Sourcing is also an issue, as a search for the article subject does not turn up any in-depth reliable sources. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note There is a "repeatedly created" template on the page. Prior deletions ere G6 for a move and a ProD, and thus a soft deletion. Don't see salt as warranted and subject may one day prove notable. Cheers, Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG ,WP:NACTOR and WP:MUSICBIO.Subject started in 2015 and is upcoming in her career a case of WP:TOOSOON at best not notable currently.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough to show notability, espeically for a 15-year-old. I think we should double down on privacy and BLP protections for minors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.