Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackpot.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎ per WP:CSD#G5. ✗plicit 00:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jackpot.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can see a substantial number of articles covering their expansions and deals, but these articles lack in-depth coverage of the subject. They appear promotional or sponsored, with the coverage being trivial and not significant enough to meet WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. GrabUp - Talk 06:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Companies, Websites, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I originally added the notability tag as it was clear to me this was little more than a promo article. The source support that view. -OXYLYPSE (talk) 08:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Not all sources appear to be primary. Even though some major platforms quote the company official website, but there appear to be notability of this online casino on high-stake platforms like CNBC, Bloomberg, Common Wealth Beacon, Sports Business Journal, and several other news platforms. Suffices WP:GAME. 185.233.164.136 (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC) — 185.233.164.136 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete, perhaps speedy since this appears to have been written to promote a non-notable company. The coverage is all WP:ORGTRIV (new market launches, etc.), WP:TRADES publications and/or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS -- there is no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS. As for the SPA !vote above, I am not sure what notability principle is being invoked by an essay on gaming the system, but the applicable guideline is WP:NCORP and this subject fails that. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Weak notability, however article can be further sourced with reliable, third party sources and can be categorised under stubs.

Pjermihov (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was created by a confirmed sockpuppet of Rpgea, see this. - Ratnahastin (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.