Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Educational Hub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Educational Hub

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a non notable YouTube Channel. Wants to promote its channel. References do not show the notability of the subject. Fails WP:GNG, WP:RS GermanKity (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is an existing draft which has been rejected twice. The author has presumably gone and done a copy and paste move. – robertsky (talk) 13:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly not yet notable. Does not pass WP:GNG. Mccapra (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only references are a Wikipedia edit that the article creator made, and the YouTube channel. Clearly not notable per nom. Vukky, a real human 👀 (talk to me!) 08:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom. no indication of notability. Interestingly first citation is a circular reference to Wikipedia. RationalPuff (talk) 11:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, possibly speediable as not just utterly non-notable but unimportant. ("It is not so well-known" — quite.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.