Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InventWood
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Merge target.) asilvering (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- InventWood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertising page for a startup which, as yet, has no commercial product. Both this page and the related product page superwood were recently created by the same group of editors. No WP:SIGCOV beyond a little science churnalism. If the product takes off then, perhaps, the company should have a page. At present this content belongs on Facebook etc, not an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:40, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Engineering, and Maryland. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:40, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete The sources are almost 100% about the unlaunched product, not the company (and almost 100% churnalism). If the product takes off and the company becomes notable, then we can reconsider, but for now fails WP:NCORP. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep based on present citations and also see many additional citations such as roboticsandautomationnews, Wood Central, WebProNews, techeblog, Interesting Engineering, HBS Dealer. There are many more... Hkkingg (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Despite some WP:CRYSTAL issues the company has received enough coverage for an article. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] TurboSuperA+(connect) 08:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Merge to Superwood (or merge Superwood to here). Per WP:NPRODUCT, we don't need both articles for a product that hasn't even entered production yet.
In cases where a company is mainly known for a single series of products or services, it is usually better to cover the company and its products/services in the same article.
Black Kite (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC) - Merge to Superwood (or vice versa) per WP:NPRODUCT. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:15, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superwood, brought to us by the same nom. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Per the references provided in the article, passes notability criteria.CresiaBilli (talk) 02:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.