Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intuit Money Manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources brought up at the end of the discussion seem to establish notability. I will gladly relist, however, if a user feels that this closure has been too disregarding of consensus (although note that nominator is neutral). Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intuit Money Manager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural. Dealt with an IP at WP:AIV that was removing PROD tag. Since it shouldn't have been replaced regardless, bringing to AfD instead. Concerns; notability, references, COI, spam etc. I am neutral. Black Kite (t) (c) 12:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable , COI, spam. Marokwitz (talk) 13:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete promotional article. no coverage except press releases.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Hobit below. Independent coverage in Livemint and CIOL is enough to establish notability.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, though it is probably worth a mention in Intuit India. A minor product of a significant brand. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or how about a Merge? $Raa G gio (talk)$ 21:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep lots of spamming out there via PR releases, but [1] and Wall Street Journal? appear to cause the topic to meet WP:N. Hobit (talk) 05:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rabbabodrool (talk) 21:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Erb? Nom it neutral and sources have been provided... Hobit (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.